How Is Tax Policy Shaping the Future of Clean Energy Investment?
The Expert: Tom Bitting

print this article

US electricity demand is accelerating at a pace few anticipated. Growth in artificial intelligence (AI), electric vehicles, reshored manufacturing, and the large data centers that provide the connectivity infrastructure for each is pushing the power grid toward record new demand beyond its current capacity. Energy consulting firms predict sharp growth in the immediate future: Grid Strategies, for example, projects 128 gigawatts of additional US demand by the end of 2029, a near fivefold leap since 2022,1 and ICF forecasts annual growth of 3.2 percent through 2030, the steepest increase in the country in seventy years.2 These projections excite investors, but when coupled with market uncertainty on a number of fronts, the United States may miss out on the opportunity before it.

Clean energy sources, along with continued production of existing sources of power, are essential to filling this demand. Clean energy provides the best potential for both short-term supply increases and, along with traditional sources, additional capacity over the long term. Only this past summer, the largest grid operator, PJM, issued a “maximum generation alert,”3 and New Orleans experienced a planned blackout affecting more than 100,000 residents before the peak season had even arrived.4 The US Department of Energy recently warned that blackouts could increase by 100 times in 2030 if the United States continues to shutter reliable power sources and fails to add additional firm capacity. To keep up, utilities nationwide are establishing new supply requirements that increasingly rely on clean energy sources.

Beyond state policy and corporate demand, private capital has also adapted quickly. Investors are deploying innovative financing models—such as partnerships, credit transferability, hybrid structures, and long-term offtake contracts—to keep clean energy projects moving forward despite shifting federal incentives. These mechanisms are helping to bridge policy gaps and sustain momentum for critical infrastructure investment, all while generating strong returns for investors.

AI and the Energy Imperative

All of these challenges are unfolding against the backdrop of AI’s meteoric rise as a dominant energy consumer in the last few years. AI data centers consume vastly more electricity than traditional facilities, with some drawing the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of homes per year. A single AI search can require ten times more energy than a standard internet query.5

As AI workloads proliferate, from cloud computing to generative models, renewables play a uniquely strategic role in satisfying the increased power demand. With permitting and supply chains already in motion, solar and storage are the fastest deployable sources of large-scale power solutions. Without these projects, no near-term path to meet AI-driven demand spikes would exist—which puts the United States in an unusual position.

The geopolitical implications of falling behind in the AI race are profound. As one analyst put it, “He who wins the energy war will win the AI war.”6 China is rapidly expanding renewable capacity alongside its semiconductor ambitions. Any US policy uncertainty that slows the deployment of renewable energy is expected to weaken America’s position in AI competitiveness.

Clearly, building and incentivizing clean energy generation, and, frankly, all power generation, is critical to meeting the current challenges and burgeoning global opportunities and threats facing the United States. Investment certainty and capital formation hinge on predictable processes, policies, and incentives. Yet the federal debate over the future of clean energy and the tax credits that have helped fuel their growth has injected tremendous uncertainty into the mix just as demand spikes. Let’s examine these shifting dynamics and what they mean for the future of clean energy investment.

Fueling Renewable Energy Growth

Clean energy’s rapid rise owes much to policy stability and federal, state, and local incentives. The 1992 Production Tax Credit (PTC) and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC), codified in 2005, provided early certainty for wind and solar power. More recently, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 expanded these tax incentives, creating a runway for clean energy domestic supply chain investment and large-scale deployment.

The results are crystal clear. Solar capacity has grown tenfold and wind capacity has more than doubled since 2014.7 Furthermore, renewables accounted for more than ninety percent of new generation in 2024, with solar accounting for over eighty percent.8 Since the IRA passed, domestic solar module and battery manufacturing capacity has quintupled to more than forty gigawatts.9 Throughout, companies like Panasonic and ES Foundry have opened new facilities, strengthening US supply chains.

Clean energy incentives have shaped not only national supply but also local budgets. Renewable projects are often sited in rural areas, where they provide a steady tax base and new jobs. In Texas, for instance, Vesper Energy’s Hornet Solar project in Swisher County stands as a prime example of how renewable energy can generate lasting regional benefits.10 Covering more than six square miles and equipped with over 1.36 million solar modules, Hornet Solar ranks among the nation’s largest solar installations.

Once fully operational, the facility will deliver 600 megawatts of alternating current of clean power to the ERCOT grid, strengthening energy resilience across the state. Just as significant, the project is expected to generate more than $100 million in new tax revenue for Swisher County, resources that can be reinvested into schools, infrastructure, and health care to directly enhance community well-being.

Risks of Policy Uncertainty

The rollback of clean energy tax credits has introduced significant turbulence. After the initial rollback in 2025, industry groups estimated that more than $15.5 billion worth of clean energy projects had been canceled or delayed, eliminating nearly 12,000 jobs.11 And reports from the Brattle Group and NERA Economic Consulting suggest that repealing technology-neutral tax credits could raise electricity costs substantially over the next decade.12

Individuals and businesses across the nation will feel these impacts. Specifically, residential electricity costs could rise by 7.3 percent; commercial and industrial costs might increase by 10.6 percent; and average nationwide costs could climb by 9.2 percent. Such increases would ripple through the economy, reducing competitiveness and disproportionately affecting low-income households.

Policy rollbacks also threaten grid stability. Roughly ninety percent of projects in the interconnection queue—those waiting to be built and connected over the next five years—involve renewables.13 Curtailing tax incentives destabilizes the path for these projects, slows the pace of industrial and technological innovation, and leaves fewer options to meet rising demand. And with natural gas supply chains constrained and nuclear projects requiring decades to scale, the near-term alternatives are limited.

Adaptation and Investment Strategies

Although these challenges may seem daunting, they do not represent a knockout blow to clean energy. The good news is that adaptive financing and new investment strategies can help sustain clean energy initiatives, even in the face of policy headwinds. For instance, although policy support for clean energy may be lacking at the federal level, clean energy momentum at the state level and within the private sector remains robust.

State governments continue to roll out clean energy incentives, and corporate buyers are securing long-term power purchase agreements to hedge against price volatility. These dynamics create partial insulation against federal uncertainty and ensure that projects with favorable permitting, strong community backing, or innovative financing can still advance.

At the same time, the evolving policy landscape may shift investment toward adjacent technologies and solutions still receiving bipartisan support, including advanced batteries, hydrogen, geothermal power, carbon capture, and mining of domestic critical minerals.

Building a Foundation for Continued American Growth

The ideal future is one in which innovative investment strategies for clean energy continue to grow while policymakers simultaneously gain a renewed appreciation for the role tax credits and incentives have played in stabilizing and diversifying the nation’s energy supply. For decades, these incentives have de-risked projects and unlocked private investment.

Safeguarding these tax credits, while modernizing rules around construction starts, permitting, interconnection, and transmission, remains critical. It’s worth reiterating that renewable energy growth does not negate the need for fossil fuels, nuclear energy, or emerging technologies. Instead, a diverse energy mix enhances grid resilience, minimizes disruptions, and supports both economic and environmental objectives. In this sense, preserving clean energy incentives complements rather than competes with broader energy strategies.

Renewables, supported by decades of bipartisan incentives, have become the fastest-growing and most cost-effective source of new power generation. In the process, tax credits have served not merely as fiscal instruments, but also have been foundational to capital markets, local tax bases, and long-term competitiveness. Preserving and clarifying these policies will be critical to sustaining investment, stabilizing consumer costs, and meeting the extraordinary demands of an AI-driven economy.

Conclusion

The future of US energy policy and investment strategies is being tested at a pivotal moment as demand surges due to AI and other emerging usage patterns. Clean energy has weathered policy turbulence before, propelled by a mix of federal incentives, state leadership, and private capital. That ecosystem remains intact, but it depends on clear and durable policy moving forward for it to continue to thrive. For investors, policymakers, and communities alike, policy certainty is the common denominator that will determine whether the United States builds on its momentum or cedes ground at a time when energy and technological leadership are both on the line.


Tom Bitting is a managing director and founding member of the renewable energy investment team at Advantage Capital.


Endnotes

  1. Robert Walton, “Five-Year US Loan Growth Forecast Surges 456%, to 128 GW: Grid Strategies,” Utility Dive, December 6, 2024, www.utilitydive.com/news/shocking-forecast-us-electricity-load-could-grow-128-gw-over-next-5-years-Grid-Strategies/734820/.
  2. Brian Martucci, “ICF Sees 25% Load Growth by 2030, Up to 40% Price Increase,” Utility Dive, May 21, 2025, www.utilitydive.com/news/icf-sees-25-load-growth-by-2030-up-to-40-price-increase/748711/.
  3. “US Grid Operator PJM Issues Maximum Generation Alert for July 16,” Reuters, July 16, 2025, www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-grid-operator-pjm-issues-maximum-generation-alert-july-16-2025-07-16/.
  4. “Massive Louisiana Power Outage Affects Thousands and Disrupts Memorial Day Weekend,” Economic Times of India, May 25, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/massive-louisiana-power-outage-affects-thousands-and-disrupts-memorial-day-weekend/articleshow/121405186.cms.
  5. United Nations, “Artificial Intelligence: How Much Energy Does AI Use?” Regional Information Centre for Western Europe, July 4, 2025, https://unric.org/en/artificial-intelligence-how-much-energy-does-ai-use/.
  6. @WeHavetheData, “Electricity Generation,” Instagram, June 29, 2025, www.instagram.com/p/DLggDgpMEgQ/.
  7. Gavin Maguire, “World Solar Generation Set to Eclipse Nuclear for the First Time,” Reuters, May 21, 2025, www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/world-solar-generation-set-eclipse-nuclear-first-time-maguire-2025-05-21/.
  8. “Renewables Made Up More Than 90 Percent of New Power Installed Globally Last Year,” Yale Environment 360, Yale School of the Environment, March 26, 2025, https://e360.yale.edu/digest/renewable-capacity-irena-2024.
  9. United States Department of Energy, Quarterly Solar Industry Update, October 30, 2024, www.energy.gov/eere/solar/quarterly-solar-industry-update.
  10. “Hornet Solar” [homepage], Hornet Solar, accessed October 31, 2025, www.hornetsolartx.com/.
  11. Bloomberg, “US Clean Energy Project Cancellations Hit GOP Districts Hardest,” The Business Download, October 21, 2025, https://thebusinessdownload.com/us-clean-energy-project-cancellations-hit-gop-districts-hardest/.
  12. Brian Martucci, “IRA Tax Credit Repeal Would Drive Up Electricity Prices, System Costs: Reports,” Utility Dive, February 27, 2025, www.utilitydive.com/news/ira-tax-credit-repeal-electricity-prices-ceba-brattle/741132/.
  13. Phoebe Skor and Bianca Giacobone, “The US Interconnection Queue Is Twice Its Installed Capacity,” Latitude Media, April 11, 2024, www.latitudemedia.com/news/the-us-interconnection-queue-is-twice-its-installed-capacity/.